RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04811
XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. The overall rating and closeout date for his Enlisted
Performance Report (EPR) for the period 1 June 2009 through 31 May
2010, be updated in the Personnel Data System (PDS) to reflect
5B-31 May 2010.
2. His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 26 February 2013, be
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to administrative reasons, the aforementioned EPR is not
loaded in the PDS and should be updated to reflect an overall
rating and close-out date of 5B-31 May 2010.
According to his AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and
Intervention Processing, a medical evaluation revealed he had
stage 3 kidney failure that precluded him from obtaining a passing
score.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of an AF
Form 77, Letter of Evaluation and AF Form 108.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 13 May 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
AF Form 108, Section III, Request for Medical Evaluation, dated
12 April 2013, indicates the applicant has stage 3 kidney disease.
The AF Form 77 entered into the Automated Records Management
System (ARMS) reflects, "Report for the period 1 Jun 2009 through
31 May 2010 is not available for administrative reasons. The PDS
contains the following overall rating and close-out date
pertaining to the missing report: 5B, 31 May 2010."
?
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID states that the corrective action requested by the
applicant pertaining to his EPR has been resolved through
pertinent administrative procedures. Therefore, it does not
require referral to the Board. The re-accomplished AF Form
77 will be sent to the ARMS.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to remove
the contested FA from the AFFMS. Under normal circumstances, when
the Primary Care Manager (PCM) determines a medical condition
exists that precludes a member from passing the FA, the PCM
provides specific limitations. There is nothing in the evidence
that reflects which components precluded the applicant from
satisfactorily completing the FA. In accordance with AFI 36-2905,
Air Force Fitness Program, "all members will complete an abdominal
circumference assessment unless exempted by medical provider."
Simply stated, without identifying specific limitations, there is
insufficient evidence to indicate the FA should be invalidated.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 22 September 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, aside
from the administrative correction to his record, we find no basis
to recommend granting the additional relief sought in this
application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 21 October 2014, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013-
04811 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 30 September 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 13 July 2014, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 28 August 2014.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 September 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04871
The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the findings of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility. The letter from his Flight Surgeon and 844th Communications Squadron Executive Director states that he was diagnosed with a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score and that he should be exempt from the cardio component...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04301
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to have her 17 October 2011 FA removed from AFFMS. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 May 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03598
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He failed the contested FA due to a medical condition that prevented him from achieving a passing score. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he would like to amend his request to have the EPR rendered for the period 1 February 2011...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05042
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the AFBCMR approve the applicants request to void the contested report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00053
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for removal of the contested FAs. The applicant has failed to provide any information from the rating officials on the contested report. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00053 in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02474
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 10 Apr 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID states based on the recommendation from DPSIM to only exempt the cardio portion of the applicants FA test and not remove the entire 10 Apr 12 FA, they recommend the AFBCMR deny the applicants request to void the contested EPR. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02880
In a letter dated 7 Apr 14, the applicants Primary Care Manager (PCM) stated that it was evident that the Synthroid regimen was being adjusted when the applicant failed her now one remaining FA failure on the AC measure. The complete FAAB evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for removal of her referral EPR for the period through 16 Jun 11. In this respect, we note the applicant provides a letter dated 7 Apr 14, from her PCM...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02775
________________________________________________________________ On 7 Jan 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicants request for removal of his failed FAs from the AFFMS stating that he should have tested within the limits of his profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the request for removal of the failed FAs dated 4 Apr 11 and 14 Nov 11 due to the lack of supporting...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03485
Furthermore, because the failed FAs resulted in the applicant receiving a referral EPR and cancellation of his promotion, to the grade of technical sergeant, we recommend the referral EPR for the period of 29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 2012 be declared void and removed from his records and that his promotion to the grade of technical sergeant be reinstated with a date of rank and effective date of 1 Sep 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 Sep 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 29...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00908
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00908 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 910, Enlistment Performance Report (EPR) (AB thru TSgt), rendered for the period 5 March 2010 thru 12 April 2011, section III, Fitness Assessment (FA) rating of Does Not Meet be changed to reflect Exempt and the referral status be removed. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at...